- Sophie Arie, freelance journalist
- 1London
- ariesophie{at}yahoo.co.uk
In roughly five years since they arrived on the market, vaccines against human papillomavirus (HPV), which causes cervical cancer, have been rapidly and widely adopted in countries that can afford to do so.
The United States and much of Europe have introduced vaccines for school age girls in addition to existing well established screening programmes for women. The vaccines—Cervarix, made by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), and Gardasil, made by Merck—protect against the most common types of virus, which cause around 70% of all cervical cancers, but they are among the most expensive of all vaccines. Both companies say their prices reflect a major investment in research and development and relatively complex manufacturing processes. Pricing varies from country to country but the current price in the US for a three dose course of Cervarix is a little under $300 (£187; €222) for government health service providers and close to $360 for private healthcare providers.1
In the developing world, however, the situation is very different. Nearly 530 000 women each year develop cervical cancer and 275 000 die from it.2 More than 85% of those deaths occur in low and middle income countries, where cervical cancer is the most common type of cancer in women, but screening is usually available only to women who can afford it privately, and where there is little or no capacity to treat the disease, let alone the resources to invest in a vaccine.
More than 60% of women who contract the disease in the developing world die of it because of late detection. According to the World Health Organization, if current trends continue, the …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10
Published 16 May 2012
Re: Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study
Published 16 May 2012
Re: Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study
Published 16 May 2012
Re: Why the US healthcare system is failing, and what might rescue it
Published 16 May 2012
Re: Risk of cardiovascular serious adverse events associated with varenicline use for tobacco cessation: systematic review and meta-analysis
Published 16 May 2012
Most responses
Is spending on proton beam therapy for cancer going too far, too fast? (11 responses)
Published 17 Apr 2012 - 23:32
What are the benefits of an early diagnosis? (8 responses)
Published 18 Apr 2012
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (8 responses)
Published 2 May 2012
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21