Secrets of the MMR scare

The Lancet’s two days to bury bad news

BMJ 2011; 342 doi: (Published 18 January 2011)
Cite this as: BMJ 2011;342:c7001

Related articles

News: University College London issues new research standards but says it won’t investigate Wakefield

Editorial: Institutional research misconduct

Feature: Commentary: Skilled forensic capacity needed to investigate allegations of research misconduct

News: College investigates whether Wakefield was guilty of scientific fraud

Views & Reviews: Research misconduct revisited

Letter: Infection more important than anaemia or allergy

Letter: The BMJ’s measly editorial policies

Letter: Are the GMC, news media, and BMJ the right tribunals?

Editor's Choice: Institutional and editorial misconduct in the MMR scare

Observations: Is research safe in their hands?

Editorial: Assuring research integrity in the wake of Wakefield

Views & Reviews: How campaigners and the media push bad science

Feature: How the vaccine crisis was meant to make money

Feature: How the case against the MMR vaccine was fixed

See more

Practice: Ordering and interpreting hepatitis B serology

News: Tamiflu purchase worth £49m will go ahead, government says

Clinical Review: Anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation

News: Cochrane review questions effectiveness of neuraminidase inhibitors

This article has been cited by other articles: