Rapid responses are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on thebmj.com. Although a selection of rapid responses will be included online and in print as readers' letters, their first appearance online means that they are published articles. If you need the url (web address) of an individual response, perhaps for citation purposes, simply click on the response headline and copy the url from the browser window. Letters are indexed in PubMed.
I just would like one reviewer to receive two papers at the same
time: one from MIT, Boston, USA and the other from University of Dhaka in
Bangladesh. There is no way, a person can not be biased as to the quality
of science performed according to some pre-perceived notions about a
country. Its part of human nature. And this exactly should be avoided if
the major aim of the peer review process is to promote good and fair
evaluation of science. In the open review process, the reviewer will be
forced to review the manuscript content and not be clouded by the economy,
the GDP, the international stature of a given country.