Sibutramine isn’t safe for adults with cardiovascular disease
Sibutramine was associated with extra heart attacks and strokes, but not deaths, in a placebo controlled trial that tested the drug in obese adults with cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, or both. Sibutramine is already banned in Europe, and the Food and Drug Administration is currently considering its place on the US market⇑. In this trial, published ahead of a crucial FDA meeting on 15 September, adults who took sibutramine for a mean of 3.4 years had 28% more non-fatal heart attacks (4.1% v 3.2%; hazard ratio 1.28, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.57) and 36% more non-fatal strokes (2.6% v 1.9%; 1.36 to 1.04 to 1.77) than those who took placebo. The greatest risks were confined to those with established cardiovascular disease in subgroup analyses. Sibutramine did not seem to cause ischaemic events in people with diabetes alone. The trial was funded by Abbott, the company that makes sibutramine.
Even in the US, sibutramine is not recommended for adults with cardiovascular disease because it has sympathomimetic effects that can (and did) increase heart rate and blood pressure. People who took sibutramine in this trial lost significantly more weight than controls who took placebo (an extra 1.7 kg), but an editorial still calls for the FDA to follow Europe’s lead and take the drug off the US market (p 972). Doctors may be able to avoid prescribing sibutramine to patients with known cardiovascular disease but surely not to those whose disease has yet to show itself clinically. The benefits are modest and the risks are clear says the editorial. It is up to the FDA now.
Modest benefits from a dementia programme by occupational therapists
Non-drug treatments for dementia have had limited success in trials. The latest to be tested was an intensive intervention by occupational therapists that aimed to reduce functional dependence for adults with dementia and …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10
Published 16 May 2012
Re: Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study
Published 16 May 2012
Re: Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study
Published 16 May 2012
Re: Why the US healthcare system is failing, and what might rescue it
Published 16 May 2012
Re: Risk of cardiovascular serious adverse events associated with varenicline use for tobacco cessation: systematic review and meta-analysis
Published 16 May 2012
Most responses
Is spending on proton beam therapy for cancer going too far, too fast? (11 responses)
Published 17 Apr 2012 - 23:32
What are the benefits of an early diagnosis? (8 responses)
Published 18 Apr 2012
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (8 responses)
Published 2 May 2012
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21