- Margaret McCartney, general practitioner, Glasgow, and Financial Times columnist
- margaret{at}margaretmccartney.com
“One in nine women will get breast cancer.” “One in four people will have a mental health problem.” “One in 11 men will get prostate cancer.” In terms of statistics we know that frequencies are better understood than percentages. But are these the kinds of numbers that we really want to be widely understood?
All these statistics are used as slogans by charities to raise “awareness” and to fight their cause. The “one in four” slogan is also reeled off everywhere from parliament to official NHS guidance, but mental health charities have done a great deal to make this statistic widely known. Yet the data behind it come not from prospective trials but from …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012