Hearings in camera are bad public policyBMJ 2010; 341 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c4294 (Published 10 August 2010) Cite this as: BMJ 2010;341:c4294
- Peter J Stephens, consultant in forensic pathology1
- 1Burnsville, NC 28714, USA
The suggestion that witnesses in child protection proceedings should be heard in camera is dismaying.1 Traditionally, anonymity for witnesses has been reserved for very few cases such as official secrets, when the lives of police officers and their families may be threatened, and when the safety of rape victims is threatened. None of these situations applies to child protection …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial