This article has a correction
Please see: Ectopic pregnancy
- Sheikha Al-Jabri, fellow of minimally invasive gynaecology,
- Michael Malus, associate professor, department of family medicine,
- Togas Tulandi, professor of obstetrics and gynaecology and Milton Leong chair in reproductive medicine
- 1McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada H3A 1A1
- Correspondence to: S Al-Jabri s_umreem{at}hotmail.com
- Accepted 20 May 2010
Case scenario
A 33 year-old woman presented to the emergency department with a five day history of low abdominal pain. Her last menstrual period was five weeks before; she said she was using progesterone-only pills for contraception and had a history of Chlamydia infection, so a pregnancy test was not done. She was diagnosed with pelvic inflammatory disease and prescribed antibiotics. She returned to the emergency department two days later with worsening abdominal pain, hypotension, and tachycardia. An urgent pregnancy test and ultrasonography led to the diagnosis of a tubal ectopic pregnancy.
In women of reproductive age, ruling out ectopic pregnancy is mandatory as it is still the leading cause of death in the first trimester of pregnancy. This needs a high index of suspicion and an early pregnancy test. A negative test result excludes ectopic pregnancy, and a positive result demands further clinical, biochemical, and ultrasound examination to exclude or confirm ectopic pregnancy. The possibility of medical treatment for ectopic pregnancy makes early diagnosis even more important.
How common is it?
The estimated incidence of ectopic pregnancy in the United Kingdom is 11.1 per 1000 reported pregnancies.1 However, some of these cases could be misdiagnosed. A retrospective study estimated that 12% of ectopic pregnancies were missed at initial presentation.2 In a prospective consecutive case series among women with ectopic pregnancy who …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10
Published 16 May 2012
Re: Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study
Published 16 May 2012
Re: Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study
Published 16 May 2012
Re: Why the US healthcare system is failing, and what might rescue it
Published 16 May 2012
Re: Risk of cardiovascular serious adverse events associated with varenicline use for tobacco cessation: systematic review and meta-analysis
Published 16 May 2012
Most responses
Is spending on proton beam therapy for cancer going too far, too fast? (11 responses)
Published 17 Apr 2012 - 23:32
What are the benefits of an early diagnosis? (8 responses)
Published 18 Apr 2012
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (8 responses)
Published 2 May 2012
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21