- Harlan M Krumholz, Harold H Hines, Jr, professor of medicine123,
- Rodney A Hayward, co-director 45
- 1Section of Cardiovascular Medicine and Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
- 2Section of Health Policy and Administration, School of Public Health, Yale University School of Medicine
- 3Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven
- 4Health Services Research and Development Center of Excellence, Ann Arbor, VA Medical Center, Michigan, USA
- 5Schools of Public Health and Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Correspondence to: H M Krumholz harlan.krumholz{at}yale.edu
- Accepted 21 April 2010
Current guidelines and performance measures concerning risk factors for coronary artery disease emphasise the importance of achieving target cholesterol levels without strong guidance about the strategies used to achieve them. Some health programmes also pay doctors whose patients achieve specific lipid targets.1 The target approach opened the door for marketing campaigns to promote drugs that have not been shown to affect patient outcomes. For example, ezetimibe was heavily promoted in the United States, with the manufacturers spending more than $200m (£130m; €160m) on direct to consumer advertising of Vytorin (ezetimibe plus simvastatin) in 2007. Millions of prescriptions were written, even though no clinical trial of the drug had focused on patient outcomes.2 3 The focus on targets is out of alignment with evidence from clinical trials and discounts the importance of testing whether the benefits of a treatment exceed its risks, instead suggesting that we can rely on its effects on biomarkers.
Current US guidelines
The “treat to target” model, which focuses on cholesterol levels is deeply embedded in medical dogma. Current US guidelines, last published in 2004 and now under review, propose a low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol target <2.6 mmol/ l (100 mg/dl) for patients with coronary heart disease, <3.4 mmol/l (130 mg/dl) for those with two or more risk factors, and <4.1 mmol/l (160 mg/dl) for those with fewer than two risk factors. Moreover, a revision of the guidelines suggested an optional goal of <1.8 mmol/l for patients with coronary heart disease.4 Performance measures have also focused on achieving target levels.5
The approach used by the guidelines is based on the dogma best described by Daniel …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012