Letters
Homoeopathy debate
Editorial ignores evidence
BMJ 2010; 340 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c594 (Published 02 February 2010) Cite this as: BMJ 2010;340:c594
- Peter A Fisher, clinical director1
- on behalf of Robert T Mathie, David Owen, Anita E Davies, Jeremy Swayne, Tom Whitmarsh, Gary J Smyth, Noel Thomas, Boris Morrice, George Lewith, Saul Berkovitz, Sosie Kassab, David Peters, Joyce Frye, Mike Cummings, Menachem Oberbaum, and seven others
- 1Royal London Homoeopathic Hospital, London WC1N 3HR
- peter.fisher{at}uclh.nhs.uk
The BMJ’s coverage of homoeopathy is biased and systematically ignores the evidence. We are astonished that the BMJ commissioned David Colquhoun’s polemical rant as an editorial.1 He attacks the minister, the Department of Health’s chief scientist, the chief executive of the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £173 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£38 / $45 / €42 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.