Letters Homoeopathy debate

Editorial ignores evidence

BMJ 2010; 340 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c594 (Published 02 February 2010) Cite this as: BMJ 2010;340:c594
  1. Peter A Fisher, clinical director1
  2. on behalf of Robert T Mathie, David Owen, Anita E Davies, Jeremy Swayne, Tom Whitmarsh, Gary J Smyth, Noel Thomas, Boris Morrice, George Lewith, Saul Berkovitz, Sosie Kassab, David Peters, Joyce Frye, Mike Cummings, Menachem Oberbaum, and seven others
  1. 1Royal London Homoeopathic Hospital, London WC1N 3HR
  1. peter.fisher{at}uclh.nhs.uk

    The BMJ’s coverage of homoeopathy is biased and systematically ignores the evidence. We are astonished that the BMJ commissioned David Colquhoun’s polemical rant as an editorial.1 He attacks the minister, the Department of Health’s chief scientist, the chief executive of the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe