Letters Lethal injections

Case for a doctor’s involvement in judicial executions

BMJ 2010; 340 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c2980 (Published 16 June 2010) Cite this as: BMJ 2010;340:c2980
  1. Michael M Rivlin, tutor in medical ethics1
  1. 1University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9NL
  1. m.rivlin{at}leeds.ac.uk

    Weaver provides some good arguments against the involvement of doctors in judicial executions.1 However, I do not find them persuasive. (For the record, I am firmly opposed to capital punishment.)

    For instance, he writes, “There is no patient; harm is done on purpose; …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial