CCBYNC Open access
Research

Transdermal and oral hormone replacement therapy and the risk of stroke: a nested case-control study

BMJ 2010; 340 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c2519 (Published 04 June 2010) Cite this as: BMJ 2010;340:c2519
  1. Christel Renoux, fellow1,
  2. Sophie Dell’Aniello, statistician1,
  3. Edeltraut Garbe, professor2,
  4. Samy Suissa, professor1
  1. 1McGill Pharmacoepidemiology Research Unit, Center for clinical epidemiology, Jewish General Hospital, and the Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada H3T 1E2
  2. 2Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Bremen Institute for Prevention Research and Social Medicine, University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany
  1. Correspondence to: S Suissa samy.suissa{at}mcgill.ca
  • Accepted 8 November 2009

Abstract

Objectives To determine the risk of stroke associated with oral and transdermal routes of administration of hormone replacement therapy.

Design Population based nested case-control study.

Setting About 400 general practices in the United Kingdom contributing to the General Practice Research Database.

Participants Cohort of all women in the database aged 50-79 years between 1 January 1987 and 31 October 2006 who were members of a practice that fulfilled predefined quality criteria and without a diagnosis of stroke before cohort entry. For each case of stroke occurring during follow-up, up to four controls were selected from among the cohort members in the risk sets defined by the case. Exposure to hormone replacement therapy (HRT) was categorised into oestrogens only, oestrogens plus progestogen, progestogen only, and tibolone. Oestrogens were further subdivided according to the route of administration (oral v transdermal) and dose (high v low).

Main outcome measures Rate ratio of stroke associated with current use of oral and transdermal HRT compared with no use. Current use was considered as a prescription whose duration included the index date.

Results There were 15 710 cases of stroke matched to 59 958 controls. The rate of stroke in the cohort was 2.85 per 1000 per year. The adjusted rate ratio of stroke associated with current use of transdermal HRT was 0.95 (95% CI 0.75 to 1.20) relative to no use. The risk of stroke was not increased with use of low oestrogen dose patches (rate ratio 0.81(0.62 to 1.05)) compared with no use, whereas the risk was increased with high dose patches (rate ratio 1.89 (1.15 to 3.11)). Current users of oral HRT had a higher rate of stroke than non-users (rate ratio 1.28 (1.15 to 1.42)) with both low dose and high dose.

Conclusions The use of transdermal HRT containing low doses of oestrogen does not seem to increase the risk of stroke. The presence of residual confounding, however, cannot be entirely excluded in the interpretation of this finding.

Footnotes

  • Contributors: All authors contributed to the study design, SD’A performed the statistical analysis, CR wrote the initial draft, and all authors critically revised the manuscript. All authors had full access to all of the data (including statistical reports and tables) in the study and can take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. SS is the guarantor for the paper.

  • Funding: This research was funded by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), the Canadian Foundation for Innovation, and Organon. SS is the recipient of a distinguished investigator award from the CIHR. CR is the recipient of a postdoctoral fellowship from the Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada

  • The study sponsor had no role in study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the article for publication. All authors declare they are independent from all source of funding.

  • Competing interests: SS received research funding from Organon, Schering, and Wyeth, makers of hormone replacement therapy. EG received research funding and acted as a consultant to Schering AG.

  • Ethical approval: The study was approved by the Scientific and Ethical Advisory Board of the GPRD.

  • Data sharing: No additional data available.

  • Accepted 8 November 2009

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.

View Full Text

Sign in

Log in through your institution

Subscribe