Since 2002 people in England with multiple sclerosis have been able to access disease modifying drugs through a risk sharing scheme.1 The scheme was set up after the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) recommended that the drugs should not be used in the NHS because of doubts about their effectiveness and high price. It suggested instead that the Department of Health could work with the manufacturers to make the treatments available to NHS patients in a cost effective manner—that is, at a lower price.2
Under the terms of the scheme interferon beta (Avonex, Betaseron, and Rebif) and glatiramer acetate would be made available to NHS patients in the context of a study monitoring disease progression. The data were to be reviewed at two year intervals. If the observed benefit was less than that predicted by the model NICE had commissioned from the Sheffield School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR),3 which four of us worked on, the drug price would be reduced to achieve a target cost effectiveness ratio of £36 000 (€40 000; $54 000) per quality adjusted life year (QALY).1
Since the start of the scheme, 5583 patients meeting the Association of British Neurologist criteria have received one or more treatments, costing in the region of £350m. The first report of effectiveness was not published until last December.4 The authors of the report, which was published in the BMJ, concluded “we found no evidence that these treatments are cost effective.”4 They also state that “we cannot reliably determine whether the current pricing of these drugs represents value for money for the NHS.”4 Despite these findings, the NHS is still …
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27