- Robin J M Franklin, professor of neuroscience1,
- Charles ffrench-Constant2,
- professor of medical neurology
- 1MRC Centre for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine and MS Society Cambridge Centre for Myelin Repair, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0ES
- 2MRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine and Centre for Multiple Sclerosis Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ
- rjf1000{at}cam.ac.uk; cffc{at}ed.ac.uk
Few subjects in contemporary medicine have generated more excitement and controversy than stem cells. The potential of stem cells to generate different cell types opens up the possibility of new treatments for regenerating damaged tissue. Stem cells have attracted particular interest for their potential to treat neurological disease because tissues within the central nervous system cannot regenerate.
Multiple sclerosis is an autoimmune disease where the immune response targets myelinating cells (oligodendrocytes) within the central nervous system. It is characterised by focal inflammation, demyelination, and axonal damage. Multiple sclerosis differs fundamentally from the “classic” neurodegenerative diseases—Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and Huntington’s disease—in which neurones are irreversibly destroyed, because lost oligodendrocytes and thus myelin can be replaced spontaneously by adult brain stem cells.1 This natural regeneration (called remyelination) can be widespread during the early stages of multiple sclerosis,2 but it is not sustained, and the increasing failure of remyelination underlies the loss of axons that characterises disease progression.
Effective treatments for multiple sclerosis must therefore be able to limit damage by inhibiting the immune response and repair damage by replacing lost …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012