- Robin J M Franklin, professor of neuroscience1,
- Charles ffrench-Constant2,
- professor of medical neurology
- 1MRC Centre for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine and MS Society Cambridge Centre for Myelin Repair, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0ES
- 2MRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine and Centre for Multiple Sclerosis Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ
- rjf1000{at}cam.ac.uk; cffc{at}ed.ac.uk
Few subjects in contemporary medicine have generated more excitement and controversy than stem cells. The potential of stem cells to generate different cell types opens up the possibility of new treatments for regenerating damaged tissue. Stem cells have attracted particular interest for their potential to treat neurological disease because tissues within the central nervous system cannot regenerate.
Multiple sclerosis is an autoimmune disease where the immune response targets myelinating cells (oligodendrocytes) within the central nervous system. It is characterised by focal inflammation, demyelination, and axonal damage. Multiple sclerosis differs fundamentally from the “classic” neurodegenerative diseases—Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and Huntington’s disease—in which neurones are irreversibly destroyed, because lost oligodendrocytes and thus myelin can be replaced spontaneously by adult brain stem cells.1 This natural regeneration (called remyelination) can be widespread during the early stages of multiple sclerosis,2 but it is not sustained, and the increasing failure of remyelination underlies the loss of axons that characterises disease progression.
Effective treatments for multiple sclerosis must therefore be able to limit damage by inhibiting the immune response and repair damage by replacing lost …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27