A good week for chlorhexidine
All modern hospitals take active steps to protect patients from hospital acquired infections⇑. Two strategies, one specific to Staphylococcus aureus and one more general, have received support from recent randomised trials. In the first, nasal mupirocin and bathing with chlorhexidine soap helped prevent S aureus infections in nasal carriers of the pathogen who were admitted to internal medicine, cardiothoracic surgery, vascular surgery, orthopaedic, gastrointestinal surgery, or general surgery wards (3.4% (17/504) v 7.7% (32/413) in the placebo group; relative risk of S aureus infection 0.42, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.75). Carriers were identified with a rapid real time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay. Around one in five of the patients screened was a carrier.
In the second trial, skin preparation with chlorhexidine in alcohol prevented more surgical site infections than skin preparation with 10% povidone iodine in patients having mostly abdominal surgery (9.5% (39/409) v 16.1% (71/440); relative risk 0.59, 0.41 to 0.85). Patients whose skin was prepared with chlorhexidine in alcohol had fewer superficial infections (0.48, 0.28 to 0.84) and deep incisional infections (0.33, 0.11 to 1.01).
Chlorhexidine skin preparation is already recommended for preventing infections associated with intravascular catheters, says an editorial (p 75). Mounting evidence suggests it should replace povidone iodine as the antiseptic of choice before surgery too, particularly abdominal surgery.
Doctors shouldn’t fear online review by patients
Doctors are nervous about being judged by their patients in public. Being rated online invokes the same kind of stomach churning anxiety as fighting your way through a desperate crowd of peers to search for your name on a “pass” list for final exams posted on a notice board, writes one doctor from the US.
Opportunities to rate doctors online are multiplying, however, and their popularity means that they are unlikely to go away. Type your name into Google and you could find …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012