Consider physicians’ trainingBMJ 2009; 339 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b5592 (Published 31 December 2009) Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b5592
- Michael Sherratt, consultant clinical neurophysiologist1
It was illuminating to discover that in Belgium the emphasis is on achieving surgical competence, with worked hours a secondary consideration.1 But why have most of the recent discussions centred on surgical training?2 3 4
Competence in internal medicine is demanding intellectually, but perhaps less easy to verify than surgical competence. In neurophysiology we as physicians are referred cases from nearly all specialties . Conversations with referring junior doctors to clarify reasons for and expectations from electroencephalography and electromyography more often than not show that the doctor who wrote the request (a) is not available because of shift working, (b) does not know the patient in question, (c) does not know what the implications of the test result might be, and (d) has not constructed a differential diagnosis.
This fragmented exposure to case material is denying the essential apprenticeship and learning experience needed by these excellent young doctors to produce competent physicians. This attenuated training is equally as serious as the issues surrounding surgery.
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b5592
Competing interests: None declared.
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial