- Giskin Day, course director, medical humanities,
- Naiome Carter, medical student
- 1Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ
- Correspondence to: G Day giskin.day{at}imperial.ac.uk
Cut flowers form an important part of rituals surrounding celebration and consolation in a variety of cultures. Blooms are brought to the bedsides of the sick as tokens of care, but concerns about infection control have caused many hospital wards in the UK to ban, or at least discourage, bedside bouquets. Is this anxiety justified? What do patients feel about flower policies? We talked to patients and staff at the Royal Brompton Hospital and the Chelsea and Westminster Hospital about their attitudes to flowers.
Stemming infection?
Most hospitals have longstanding and uncontroversial policies of not permitting flowers in high dependency units. Press reports of flowers also being banned from general wards started appearing in 1996, when an Aberdeen hospital introduced a “no flowers” policy on an orthopaedic ward.1
The impetus behind the trend was that hospitals needed to show they were taking hospital acquired infections seriously. Banning flowers was a visible sign that bedside protocols were being revised. Hospitals tended to justify their actions by claiming that flower water harboured potentially deadly bacteria. Indeed, a 1973 study had found that flower water contained high counts of bacteria.2 However, subsequent research found that there was no evidence that flower water has ever caused hospital acquired infection,3 and the authors of one study concluded, “Banning flowers is not popular with the public and is unnecessary according to the evidence available.”4 Yet hospitals continue to introduce “no flower” policies, in spite of the Department of Health acknowledging in 2007 that it was “not aware of any instance of health care associated infection being traced to cut flowers in the hospital ward setting.”5
Other negative effects have been …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012