- Giskin Day, course director, medical humanities,
- Naiome Carter, medical student
- 1Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ
- Correspondence to: G Day giskin.day{at}imperial.ac.uk
Cut flowers form an important part of rituals surrounding celebration and consolation in a variety of cultures. Blooms are brought to the bedsides of the sick as tokens of care, but concerns about infection control have caused many hospital wards in the UK to ban, or at least discourage, bedside bouquets. Is this anxiety justified? What do patients feel about flower policies? We talked to patients and staff at the Royal Brompton Hospital and the Chelsea and Westminster Hospital about their attitudes to flowers.
Stemming infection?
Most hospitals have longstanding and uncontroversial policies of not permitting flowers in high dependency units. Press reports of flowers also being banned from general wards started appearing in 1996, when an Aberdeen hospital introduced a “no flowers” policy on an orthopaedic ward.1
The impetus behind the trend was that hospitals needed to show they were taking hospital acquired infections seriously. Banning flowers was a visible sign that bedside protocols were being revised. Hospitals tended to justify their actions by claiming that flower water harboured potentially deadly bacteria. Indeed, a 1973 study had found that flower water contained high counts of bacteria.2 However, subsequent research found that there was no evidence that flower water has ever caused hospital acquired infection,3 and the authors of one study concluded, “Banning flowers is not popular with the public and is unnecessary according to the evidence available.”4 Yet hospitals continue to introduce “no flower” policies, in spite of the Department of Health acknowledging in 2007 that it was “not aware of any instance of health care associated infection being traced to cut flowers in the hospital ward setting.”5
Other negative effects have been …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27