Head To Head

Should the NHS strive to eradicate all unexplained variation? Yes

BMJ 2009; 339 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b4811 (Published 19 November 2009) Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b4811
  1. Stephen Richards, medical director
  1. 1Oxfordshire Primary Care Trust, Oxford OX4 2LH
  1. lesley.corfield{at}oxfordshirepct.nhs.uk

    Variation exists in all aspects of health care. Stephen Richards argues that it is damaging to both quality of care and finances, but Richard Lilford (doi:10.1136/bmj.b4809) believes that imposing uniformity risks stifling medical progress

    Medicine is an art informed by science, and the best medicine requires both the art to be well done and the science to be accurate. Every person is different, and variation is inherent to all things. But the NHS should strive to eradicate all unwarranted, unintended, and inappropriate variation.

    Donald Berwick wrote the seminal paper on controlling variation in health care in 1991, building on the work of Walter Shewart from the 1930s.1 Berwick refers not to unexplained variation but to unintended variation. Deming recognises two types of variation: common cause (the random variation that occurs in all processes) and special cause (arising from unexpected events or unplanned situations).2 The NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement refers to “natural variation” and “artificial variation”—again there is no use of the word unexplained.3

    Economic implications

    The King’s Fund has exposed large variation …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial