Menu

 

Research Methods & Reporting

Good publication practice for communicating company sponsored medical research: the GPP2 guidelines

BMJ 2009; 339 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b4330 (Published 30 November 2009)
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b4330

Related articles

Research Methods & Reporting: SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials

Published 9 January 2013; BMJ 346 doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7586

Feature: Ghosts in the machine

Published 6 December 2011; BMJ 343 doi: 10.1136/bmj.d7860

Head to Head: Is the conflict of interest unacceptable when drug companies conduct trials on their own drugs? Yes

Published 29 November 2009; BMJ 339 doi: 10.1136/bmj.b4949

Head to Head: Is the conflict of interest unacceptable when drug companies conduct trials on their own drugs? No

Published 29 November 2009; BMJ 339 doi: 10.1136/bmj.b4953

Head to Head: Has the hunt for conflicts of interest gone too far? No

Published 28 February 2008; BMJ 336 doi: 10.1136/bmj.39491.391215.94

Head to Head: Has the hunt for conflicts of interest gone too far? Yes

Published 28 February 2008; BMJ 336 doi: 10.1136/bmj.39493.489213.AD

See more

News: “Research passports” could reduce misconduct, conference hears

Published 9 May 2013; BMJ 346 doi: 10.1136/bmj.f2971

Editorial: Publishing your research study in the BMJ

Published 17 April 2013; BMJ 346 doi: 10.1136/bmj.f2433

News: General practices could be subject to “Ofsted style” ratings within two years

Published 22 March 2013; BMJ 346 doi: 10.1136/bmj.f1941

This article has been cited by other articles:

Latest comments and most commented

THIS WEEK'S POLL

Read related article

See previous polls