- Vinod K Podichetty, director, research1,
- Hikaru Morisue, assistant2
- 1Medical Interventional and Surgical Spine Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, 2950 Cleveland Clinic Blvd, Weston FL 33331, USA
- 2Orthopaedic Department of Keio University Hospital, 35 Shinanomachi Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan 160-8582
- podichv{at}ccf.org
“Clinical prediction rules” or “decision rules” are designed to suggest a pathway of probability of a pathological condition and help the clinician choose a diagnostic or therapeutic course of action. The rules reduce the uncertainty inherent in medical practice—for example, in emergency medicine and trauma—by appraising clinical findings to make predictions. Because these rules affect patient care and health costs, they must be carefully evaluated before implementation. For this purpose, guidance and methodological standards exist for users and developers of clinical prediction rules.1 2 In the linked cluster randomised controlled study (doi:10.1136/bmj.b4146),3 Steill and colleagues assess the effectiveness of a knowledge translation strategy to implement the validated Canadian c-spine rule in 12 emergency departments in Canada.
Specific algorithms and prediction rules for the initial assessment of patients with cervical spine injury have been proposed in the literature. Since the early 1990s, the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study’s low risk criteria (NEXUS)4 and the …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27