- Philip Wood, consultant immunologist1,
- Daniel Peckham, consultant respiratory physician2
- 1Department of Clinical Immunology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF
- 2Department of Respiratory Medicine, St James’s University Hospital
- Correspondence to: P Wood philip.wood{at}leedsth.nhs.uk
The patient
A 29 year old man presents to the surgery with a third episode of respiratory tract infection in three months, having had one admission to hospital with proved pneumococcal pneumonia five months ago. He is a previously well non-smoker who does not have asthma, any previous diagnosed chronic medical condition, or recent history of foreign travel.
He has no weight loss or night sweats. On examination he has bilateral basal crackles in the lungs, normal tympanic membranes, no facial tenderness, and no lymphadenopathy or splenomegaly. A full blood count is normal; random and fasting blood glucose, urea, creatinine, and liver enzymes are all normal, and urinalysis is negative for blood and protein. Sputum culture identifies the presence of Haemophilus influenzae. A chest radiograph is reported as normal.
What is the next investigation?
In 2007 the reported prevalence for acute respiratory infections in the United Kingdom was 1599/10 000 population, with peaks in early childhood and in people over 75 years of age. In contrast, the reported prevalence for pneumococcal pneumonia, and for pneumonia due to other causes, was 2/10 000.1 Upper respiratory tract infections are therefore common but are highly unlikely to indicate an underlying medical condition when they occur in isolation. There are no data on what constitutes a “normal” frequency of respiratory infections, and the characteristics of episodes of infection need to be considered.
Patients may have concerns over recurrent infections and their immunological competence. When infections are severe, persist despite standard therapy, recur after treatment is finished or at an unexpected frequency, or where the isolated organism is unusual within the clinical context, further investigation for underlying causes is warranted. Outside these situations, immunodeficiency is unlikely. …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27