Editorials

Escherichia coli O157

BMJ 2009; 339 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b4076 (Published 06 October 2009) Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b4076
  1. Mary Locking, epidemiologist,
  2. John Cowden, consultant epidemiologist, head of gastrointestinal disease and zoonoses programme
  1. 1Health Protection Scotland, Glasgow G3 7LN
  1. mary.locking{at}nhs.net

    Early clinical diagnosis and outbreak identification are essential to prevent serious sequelae and further transmission

    Because the annual incidence rate of Escherichia coli O157 infection in 2008—an unexceptional year—was 2.9 per 100 000 population in the United Kingdom,1 most clinicians will rarely see a case of infection with this or any other serotype of verotoxigenic E coli. It is vital, however, that they—and particularly general practitioners—have a low threshold for suspecting E coli O157 infection, because it can cause serious complications and large outbreaks, as highlighted by recent incidents involving visitors to open farms (www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/339/sep15_2/b3795). Such outbreaks also exemplify the difficulties of controlling sources of infection, and the importance of general practitioners in promptly reporting suspected cases, and in preventing both serious sequelae and secondary spread.

    The low infectious dose of E coli O157—probably fewer than 1000 organisms—increases the risk of large outbreaks, and secondary spread, which causes 6-17% of all cases and up to 31% of outbreak cases.2 Bloody diarrhoea occurs in up to 90% of cases, …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe