- S J O’Connor, specialist registrar respiratory medicine1,
- H Verma, specialist registrar radiology2,
- S Grubnic, consultant radiologist2,
- C F J Rayner, consultant respiratory physician2
- 1Mayday University Hospital, Croydon, Surrey CR7 7YE
- 2St George’s Hospital, London
- sallyjeanoconnor{at}yahoo.co.uk
- Accepted 17 February 2009
The misconception that a pregnant patient should not undergo a chest radiograph is common. Risk to a fetus during chest radiography is minimal, but reluctance to image pregnant patients can delay diagnosis and affect outcomes. We describe two cases illustrating use of this investigation when clinically indicated.
Case 1
A 38 year old woman was referred to the chest clinic by her general practitioner. She was 31 weeks pregnant and reported an eight week history of fever, dry cough, and left sided chest pain. Despite repeated courses of oral antibiotics her symptoms had slowly worsened, resulting in a referral for specialist review. On examination she had decreased breath sounds at the left lung apex, left basal crackles, and soft expiratory wheeze. A chest radiograph showed a mass at the left hilum and left upper lobe collapse (fig 1⇓). Urgent bronchoscopy revealed a large vascular tumour obstructing the left upper lobe. A computed tomography (CT) scan confirmed a hypervascular lesion centred on the left upper lobe bronchus, which was most consistent with a carcinoid tumour, and several lymph nodes in the prevascular space.
She had an elective caesarean section at 35 weeks followed by a left …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27