- A Smajdor, lecturer in ethics 1, vice chair2,
- M R Sydes, senior medical statistician 3, statistician 4,
- L Gelling, senior research fellow 5, chair 4,
- M Wilkinson, consultant pathologist and honorary senior lecturer1, chair 6
- 1School of Medicine, Health Policy and Practice, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ
- 2Riverside Research Ethics Committee, Charing Cross Hospital, London W6 8RF
- 3Cancer Group, MRC Clinical Trials Unit, London NW1 2DA
- 4Cambridgeshire 4 Research Ethics Committee, Cambridge CB21 5XB
- 5Faculty of Health and Social Care, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge CB1 1PT
- 6Institute of Health Research Ethics Committee, University of East Anglia
- Correspondence to: M Wilkinson mark.wilkinson{at}nnuh.nhs.uk
- Accepted 10 August 2009
Applying for ethical review in the United Kingdom can be time consuming and burdensome for researchers.1 2 3 The process can often be made easier by implementing relatively minor changes in the early stages of drawing up the application. In this article we discuss the practicalities of preparing an application for ethical review, and the process by which decisions are made. We offer advice on how to avoid common problems when applying to a research ethics committee and provide information on the integrated research application system, launched in January 2008.
Glossary of useful terms
Chief investigator: Person with overall responsibility for the research. All applications for ethical review should be submitted by the chief investigator
Clock: Period allowed for the ethical review of a new application or substantial amendment. The clock starts on receipt of a valid application
Employing organisation: Organisation employing the chief investigator, other investigators, or research collaborators. Employers remain liable for the work of their employees
Integrated research application system (IRAS): Online application system used to apply for most permissions and approvals for research in health and social care in the UK (www.myresearchproject.org.uk/)
Local collaborator: Person undertaking certain types of straightforward research not requiring the appointment of a principal investigator and a site specific assessment (see “site specific exemption”). Local collaborators at NHS sites should still seek approval from the research and development office
Principal investigator: Person responsible for the local research site in studies with multiple sites
Protocol: Document that describes the objectives, design, methodology, statistical considerations (or other methods of data analysis), and organisation of a research study
Research site: Organisation or unit responsible for conducting any of the research procedures in a study at a particular locality
Site specific assessment: Assessment of the …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012