- Janice Hopkins Tanne
- 1New York
GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) is facing the first of about 600 US lawsuits claiming that its antidepressant paroxetine (marketed as Paxil in the United States and Seroxat in the United Kingdom) caused birth defects in infants born to mothers who took the drug while pregnant. The first case has gone to jury in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, where the company has locations in the city and its suburbs. The outcome of early trials often sets the trend for later cases.
In the Philadelphia case Michelle David claims that the drug caused life threatening heart defects in her son Lyam Kilker, who has had heart surgery several times. He is now almost 4 years old.
Lyam’s lawyer alleged in court that documents disclosed in the proceedings suggested that GSK had been aware in 1980 that information from rat studies indicated that paroxetine “could be” a cause of birth defects but that the company had decided to ignore them, reported Bloomberg, the financial news service (www.bloomberg.com, 15 Sep, “Glaxo executive’s memo suggested burying drug studies”).
A 1998 internal review by GSK of all reports of side effects tied paroxetine to an “alarmingly high number” of reports of birth defects, but the review report was not forwarded to the US Food and Drug Administration, the lawyer also alleged. It was not until 2003, when the …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Ethical considerations
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Raised inflammatory markers
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Published 14 February 2012
Smokefree cars in Wales: Laws are better
Published 14 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (8 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012