- Janice Hopkins Tanne
- 1New York
GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) is facing the first of about 600 US lawsuits claiming that its antidepressant paroxetine (marketed as Paxil in the United States and Seroxat in the United Kingdom) caused birth defects in infants born to mothers who took the drug while pregnant. The first case has gone to jury in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, where the company has locations in the city and its suburbs. The outcome of early trials often sets the trend for later cases.
In the Philadelphia case Michelle David claims that the drug caused life threatening heart defects in her son Lyam Kilker, who has had heart surgery several times. He is now almost 4 years old.
Lyam’s lawyer alleged in court that documents disclosed in the proceedings suggested that GSK had been aware in 1980 that information from rat studies indicated that paroxetine “could be” a cause of birth defects but that the company had decided to ignore them, reported Bloomberg, the financial news service (www.bloomberg.com, 15 Sep, “Glaxo executive’s memo suggested burying drug studies”).
A 1998 internal review by GSK of all reports of side effects tied paroxetine to an “alarmingly high number” of reports of birth defects, but the review report was not forwarded to the US Food and Drug Administration, the lawyer also alleged. It was not until 2003, when the …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Does iron deficiency without anaemia cause fatigue and what is the reason behind it?
Published 26 May 2012
Re: Histology of Pilar Cysts - a counsel of perfection?
Published 26 May 2012
Re: David Southall: anatomy of a wrecked career
Published 26 May 2012
Re: The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality
Published 26 May 2012
Re: Five years after baby Peter
Published 26 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27