A tax on sugary drinks would improve public health, say US experts
A panel of public health experts from across the US have urged federal and state governments to tax sugary drinks in an attempt to control the obesity epidemic. They propose taxing producers and wholesalers 1 cent per fluid ounce on all drinks containing added sugars.
The evidence linking sweetened drinks to obesity and poor health is already compelling, they write. So is the evidence that taxing unhealthy products reduces consumption. Public support for some kind of tax is growing, particularly if tax revenues are earmarked for public health programmes to tackle obesity and encourage healthy lifestyles.
The panel estimates that a 1 cent per ounce tax would reduce calorie consumption from sugary drinks by around 10%. This drop would be enough to produce measurable health benefits in a population that has doubled its intake of sugary drinks over the past few decades.⇑ A national tax would generate nearly $15bn (£9.2bn; €10bn) in the first year.
The health problems caused by overweight and obesity currently cost $147bn, nearly 10% of all US healthcare expenditures. Governments have a right to recoup some of these costs from the drinks industry and should be prepared for strong opposition, including the kind of tactics previously employed by tobacco companies in response to taxes on cigarettes. The drinks industry has already established an organisation called “Americans Against Food Taxes,” and other similar initiatives are likely to follow.
Administrative staff help treat depression in small practices
Case management is an effective strategy for treating depressed patients in a primary care setting. It’s also beyond the means of many small general practices. So researchers evaluated telephone support given by trained healthcare assistants already employed by small practices in Germany.
In a cluster randomised trial, patients who were telephoned regularly by trained assistants had slightly but significantly lower symptom scores after 12 months than patients who …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27