- Iona Heath, general practitioner, London
- aque22{at}dsl.pipex.com
NHS Camden is the new name for Camden Primary Care Trust—a name that manages to be both misleading and megalomaniac. This most local outpost of the English Department of Health seems ever more intent on awarding successive contracts to private for-profit companies despite mounting opposition from residents and health professionals and in the complete absence of evidence of benefit for patients. In 2008 UnitedHealth UK was awarded the contract to run three general practices in Camden (BMJ 2008;336:412-3 doi:10.1136/bmj.39496.687245.DB), and since then every service put out to tender by NHS Camden has been awarded to a private provider. In August a new GP led health centre was offered to Care UK, even though the public consultation on NHS Camden’s primary and urgent care strategy will not be completed until October.
This consultation is a travesty and provides a close and dispiriting encounter with the realities of accountability and transparency in today’s NHS. It begins by inviting agreement with a series of very broad local health priorities, which include reducing health inequalities and …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27