- Janice Hopkins Tanne
- 1New York
The US president, Barack Obama, spent last week trying to quell furious protests over his proposed healthcare reforms. This included speaking at town hall meetings in the western states of Montana and Colorado.
The president and his secretary of health and human services, Kathleen Sebelius, are apparently backing down from insisting on a “public option” plan that would compete with private, profit making health insurance plans. Instead a non-profit cooperative organisation offering plans might be on the cards.
The president set out the benefits of the reforms in a New York Times article in which he said that the current system often worked better for health insurance companies than for patients (www.nytimes.com, 16 Aug, “Why we need health care reform”).
About 46 million Americans have no health insurance. But about 80% do, …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Ethical considerations
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Raised inflammatory markers
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Published 14 February 2012
Smokefree cars in Wales: Laws are better
Published 14 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (8 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012