Head To Head

Should youth mental health become a specialty in its own right? Yes

BMJ 2009; 339 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b3373 (Published 26 August 2009) Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b3373
  1. Patrick McGorry, professor of youth mental health
  1. 1Orygen Youth Health Research Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
  1. pmcgorry{at}unimelb.edu.au

    Mental illness often develops in adolescence or young adulthood. Patrick McGorry believes the best way to ensure early treatment is to have dedicated services, but Peter Birleson (doi:10.1136/bmj.b3371) argues that integration with existing systems is more important

    Even in developed countries, access to and quality of mental health care lags way behind that for mainstream health care.1 This gap is widest for young people, who have to deal with the full force of emerging mental and substance use disorders as they struggle to make the increasingly complex transition from childhood to independent adulthood. As we strive to scale up mental health services worldwide,2 there is no better place to invest.3

    Mental illnesses are the chronic diseases of young people.4 Seventy five per cent of mental disorders emerge for the first time before the age of 25.5 There is a dramatic surge in incidence beginning after puberty, peaking in the early 20s.5 It is a curious paradox that better physical health in young people has been accompanied by steadily worsening mental health.6 7 8 A youth mental health system could reduce the long term financial and human costs associated with illnesses that disable and shorten the lives of so many young people.

    Specific needs

    Expertise in development is essential for working with children, young people, and their families, yet our workforce is not well equipped. Sweeping demographic changes over the past half century have fundamentally altered the nature of development for young people, posing more complex challenges and developmental tasks.9 In developed countries at least, a period of emerging adulthood can now be distinguished from both childhood and truly independent adulthood.9 10 Mental disorders, even of moderate severity, can delay or derail career plans and affect relationships with family and peers, which are vital for support during this transition.11 Emerging adulthood has evolved its own culture and requires treatment models that differ substantially from those suitable for children and older adults. Similar challenges face other agencies, such as drug and alcohol, forensic, housing, and vocational services.12

    As with paediatrics, child psychiatry has focused on younger children, with attention declining from mid-adolescence.13 14 This means that the surge of new morbidity between the ages of 15 and 25 is paired with the worst access to services1 14; the system is weakest where it needs to be strongest.15 Child psychiatry’s attempts to give better services to adolescents have been unsuccessful.12 13 On the other side of the divide, adult services fail to engage or provide access to most young people who experience even severe mental disorders.13 Despite sharply rising incidence and prevalence, there is a precipitous decline in access in late adolescence.14 Consequently many of those with the greatest need typically fall between the child and adult services or feel like they do not belong.14 16 Access to and engagement in standard primary care is equally problematic for young people.17

    Tailored service

    We should aim for a solution that strengthens rather than weakens the already fragile field of psychiatry. Investing in the existing paediatric/adult model will fail to do this. The age of 18 is a poor boundary for service transition.13 14 15 Epidemiological evidence, developmental perspectives, safety, cost effectiveness, and, not least, the preferences of young people16 and their families should guide the selection of transition zones in mental health care, rather than second order legal or educational traditions. A stronger and more distinct stream of care for young people, perhaps similar in concept to what has emerged as geriatric psychiatry, would be one of the best ways to spend the mental health budget since it would help to ensure that more people get early intervention.3 Treating in the early stages of any disorder is the most effective and cost effective strategy to avert long term disease burden, and evidence is emerging that this is also true in psychiatry.18

    Creation of a youth mental health service could strengthen and extend our existing models of care. The Orygen Youth Health service for 15-25 year olds in Melbourne has achieved excellent outcomes over 13 years. Recent policy and reform initiatives in Australia have strongly endorsed substreams for 0-12 and 12-25 year olds with flexible transition zones,19 and a similar approach is being explored in Ireland20 and Canada.21 The creation of a stronger subspecialty and model of youth mental health could potentially assure the future of both child and youth psychiatry. Child and adolescent psychiatry has struggled to gain appropriate resources, but extending the subspecialty to include the age group with peak incidence could help ensure funding and make it much more viable worldwide. For sustainable progress, youth mental health must be based on the growing evidence and include staff with distinct clinical skills, youth participation, integration of drug and alcohol and vocational expertise, and early intervention. Such reform has started in Australia (www.headspace.org.au, www.oyh.org.au) and in Ireland (www.headstrong.ie) with new nationwide services for 12-25 year olds. Elsewhere, early intervention services for psychosis,22 existing child and adolescent services, and transition age youth services23 can help to form the foundations. Alliances rather than turf wars will be essential to meet this global public health challenge.

    Notes

    Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b3373

    Footnotes

    • Competing interests: PMcG is director of headspace, the National Youth Mental Health Foundation, funded by the Australian federal government, and also of Headstrong: the National Youth Mental Health Foundation of Ireland. He has not received fees for either of these roles, but Orygen Youth Health Research Centre has received funding for clinical and educational activities from the Australian government to support headspace and other youth mental health initiatives. PMcG has received funds from Astra Zeneca, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, and Janssen-Cilag to conduct investigator initiated clinical trials in psychotic and mood disorders, and support for the staging of and attendance at conferences and educational activities.

    References

    View Abstract

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe