Editorials

New methods to deal with publication bias

BMJ 2009; 339 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b3272 (Published 26 August 2009) Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b3272
  1. Hans-Hermann Dubben, associate professor
  1. 1Department of Primary Medical Care, University Medical Centre, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
  1. dubben{at}uke.uni-hamburg.de

    Are helpful, but prevention is better than cure

    Published and retrievable reports of research do not necessarily represent the research performed, and some research findings never reach the consumer. Positive findings—or those that are perceived to be positive—are more likely to be published, and in more prestigious journals, than are negative findings.1 This so called publication bias is an important factor to consider when searching for data and using it to make evidence based decisions. In the linked study (doi:10.1136/bmj.b2981), Moreno and colleagues test the performance of new methods of detecting and correcting for publication bias.2

    Data collated for a meta-analysis can be investigated for possible missing studies using a funnel plot,2 3 on which Moreno and colleagues’ method is also based. It is a plot of effect size (for example, relative risk) versus the precision of a trial’s effect estimate (for example, number of patients or standard error). Typically, data points lie in a funnel shaped area (figure). Results of smaller …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe