- Fiona Milne, APEC trustee and PRECOG coordinator1,
- Chris Redman, obstetric physician, professor2,
- James Walker, obstetrician, professor3,
- Phil Baker, obstetrician, professor, director4,
- Rebecca Black, obstetrician5,
- Jill Blincowe, midwife, antenatal senior midwife6,
- Carol Cooper, general practitioner7,
- Gillian Fletcher, women representative1,
- Mervi Jokinen, midwife, practice and standards development adviser8,
- Paul A Moran, obstetrician and gynaecologist9,
- Catherine Nelson-Piercy, obstetric physician, consultant10,
- Stephen Robson, obstetrician, professor11,
- Andrew Shennan, obstetrician, professor12,
- Angela Tuffnell, midwife sister13,
- Jason Waugh, obstetrician, consultant14
- 1Action on Pre-eclampsia, Syston LE7 1LD
- 2Nuffield Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, John Radcliffe Hospital Oxford OX3 9DU
- 3Academic Head of Paediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF
- 4NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, St Mary’s Hospital, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 0JH
- 5John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU
- 6Horton Maternity Hospital, Banbury OX16 9AL
- 7Mourne House, Maresfield Gardens NW3 5SL
- 8Royal College of Midwives, London W1G 9NH
- 9Worcestershire Royal Hospital, Worcester WR5 1DD
- 10St Thomas’ Hospital, London SE1 7EH
- 11Fetal Medicine, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH
- 12King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London SE1 7EH
- 13St James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF
- 14Royal Victoria Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP
- Correspondence to: F Milne, Action on Pre-eclampsia, 2c The Halfcroft, Syston LE7 1LD fionamilne{at}talk21.com
Why read this summary?
Pre-eclampsia remains a leading cause of maternal death, with 72% of pre-eclampsia cases associated with substandard care.1 One in 10 pregnant women develop partial signs or symptoms (73 000 a year in the United Kingdom); about 20% of these progress to pre-eclampsia.2 3 This article summarises recommendations from the Pre-Eclampsia Community Guideline (PRECOG) Group4 under the auspices of the charity Action on Pre-eclampsia. The recommendations cover the assessment of women with suspected pre-eclampsia by hospital midwives in day assessment units and complements our previous community based advice.5 6
Recommendations
PRECOG recommendations (see table 1⇓ for definitions used) are based on systematic review of evidence and expert consensus, graded A, B, C, or D; a “good practice point”(GPP) is based on the guideline development group’s experience (box 1). The grading is shown in parentheses after each recommendation.
View this table:- In this window
- In a new window
Table 1 Definitions used in the PRECOG recommendations
Box 1 Levels of evidence on which recommendations are based*†
Grading of recommendations
Grade A—Directly based on category I evidence
Grade B—Directly based on category II evidence or extrapolated recommendation from category I evidence
Grade C—Directly based on category III evidence or extrapolated recommendation from category I or II evidence
Grade D—Directly based on category IV evidence or extrapolated recommendation from category I, II, or III evidence
GPP (good practice point)—Based on the view of the guideline development group
Grading (level) of evidence
Level Ia—Evidence obtained from meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Level Ib—Evidence obtained from at least one randomised controlled trial
Level IIa—Evidence obtained from at least one well designed, controlled study without randomisation. Includes cohort studies
Level IIb— Evidence obtained from at least one other type of well designed, quasi-experimental study. Includes case-control studies
Level III—Evidence obtained from well designed, non-experimental descriptive studies, such as comparative studies, correlation studies, and case studies
Level IV—Evidence obtained from expert committee reports or …
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Ethical considerations
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Raised inflammatory markers
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Published 14 February 2012
Smokefree cars in Wales: Laws are better
Published 14 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (8 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012