Managing low grade and borderline cervical abnormalities

BMJ 2009; 339 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b3014 (Published 29 July 2009) Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b3014
  1. Eduardo L Franco, professor of epidemiology
  1. 1Departments of Oncology and Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada H2W1S6
  1. eduardo.franco{at}mcgill.ca

    The dilemma of choosing between conservative and aggressive policies remains

    Broadly speaking, the goal of cancer screening is to shift disease detection to the furthest point upstream in the course of the neoplastic process at which treatment can prevent a precancerous lesion from becoming invasive, thus averting cancer, or prevent an early cancerous lesion from spreading, thus averting death from cancer. The challenges go beyond defining end points and choosing tests and procedures: not all precancerous lesions progress to invasive disease, and not all early invasive cancers progress to causedeath. The more upstream the lesion end point targeted for intervention, the greater the probability of overtreatment and harm to patients. Conversely, acting conservatively by shifting the trigger for treatment to downstream end points risks missing lesions that should have been treated earlier.

    Anyone concerned with the challenges of screening for cancer, particularly from anatomical sites that are relatively inaccessible, must view the linked articles (doi:10.1136/bmj.b2546; doi:10.1136/bmj.b2548; doi:10.1136/bmj.b2549) from the trial of management of borderline and other low grade abnormal smears (TOMBOLA) as an embarrassment of riches.1 …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial