- Guglielmo Ronco, senior epidemiologist1,
- Marc Arbyn, head 2,
- Nereo Segnan, head1
- 1Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, Centre for Cancer Prevention, Via San Francesco da Paola 31, 10123 Turin, Italy
- 2Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium
- Correspondence to: G Ronco guglielmo.ronco{at}cpo.it
Strong evidence is now available that testing for human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is more sensitive than cytology in detecting high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, and some randomised controlled trials showed that HPV testing is able to detect, earlier than cytology, persistent and therefore clinically relevant neoplasia.1 2 However, HPV testing is less specific than cytology.3 The best management of HPV positive women is therefore of major concern.
In one of two linked articles (doi:10.1136/bmj.b2569),4 Castle and colleagues show that the risk of developing high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in the next three to five years is much higher in women with HPV infection that has persisted for at least one year than in those in whom the infection cleared. This suggests that HPV positive women need repeat testing, with differential management of those with or without persistent infection. Randomised trials have shown that if only HPV positive women with cytological abnormalities or persistent infection are referred for colposcopy, the positive predictive value for colposcopy referral is similar to that for cytological screening. …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012