- Niamh Barrett, registrar in obstetrics and gynaecology1,
- Sharon R Sheehan, research fellow2,
- Deirdre J Murphy, professor of obstetrics2
- 1Coombe Women and Infants’ University Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland
- 2Coombe Women and Infants’ University Hospital and Trinity College Dublin
- Correspondence to: S Sheehan sharon.sheehan{at}tcd.ie
A 38 year old woman booked for antenatal care in her second pregnancy. Her first baby had been delivered by emergency caesarean section after failed induction of labour. She had an uncomplicated antenatal course and hoped to achieve a vaginal delivery. At 39 weeks’ gestation she presented in spontaneous labour with regular uterine contractions. The fetus was of average size and in a cephalic presentation, with two fifths of the head palpable abdominally. On vaginal examination, the cervix was 5 cm dilated and clear liquor was draining. She was reassessed after two hours and had progressed to 9 cm dilation with the vertex 2 cm above the ischial spines. The cardiotocograph at that time was reassurring.
The obstetric registrar was called to review the patient 20 minutes later because of deep late decelerations on the cardiotocograph and fresh vaginal bleeding. On abdominal examination, four fifths of the head was palpable but no scar tenderness was noted. Vaginal examination showed a high presenting part and findings otherwise unchanged from the previous examination.
A liveborn female infant weighing 4.1 kg was delivered by emergency caesarean section. Apgar scores were 5 at one minute and 8 at five minutes. The cord blood results were abnormal (pH artery 6.9, base excess −14.6; pH vein 7.0, base excess −12.4).
The mother was transferred to the high dependency unit after delivery for 24 hours and made a good recovery. She was discharged on day 6. The baby was discharged on day 12 with arrangements for neurodevelopmental follow-up.
Questions
1 How should a woman who has had a caesarean section be counselled about her next delivery?
2 What life threatening complication probably occurred?
3 How should this patient be managed?
Answers
Short answers
1 Women who have had a caesarean section should be reviewed by a …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Ethical considerations
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Raised inflammatory markers
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Published 14 February 2012
Smokefree cars in Wales: Laws are better
Published 14 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (8 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012