- Niamh Barrett, registrar in obstetrics and gynaecology1,
- Sharon R Sheehan, research fellow2,
- Deirdre J Murphy, professor of obstetrics2
- 1Coombe Women and Infants’ University Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland
- 2Coombe Women and Infants’ University Hospital and Trinity College Dublin
- Correspondence to: S Sheehan sharon.sheehan{at}tcd.ie
A 38 year old woman booked for antenatal care in her second pregnancy. Her first baby had been delivered by emergency caesarean section after failed induction of labour. She had an uncomplicated antenatal course and hoped to achieve a vaginal delivery. At 39 weeks’ gestation she presented in spontaneous labour with regular uterine contractions. The fetus was of average size and in a cephalic presentation, with two fifths of the head palpable abdominally. On vaginal examination, the cervix was 5 cm dilated and clear liquor was draining. She was reassessed after two hours and had progressed to 9 cm dilation with the vertex 2 cm above the ischial spines. The cardiotocograph at that time was reassurring.
The obstetric registrar was called to review the patient 20 minutes later because of deep late decelerations on the cardiotocograph and fresh vaginal bleeding. On abdominal examination, four fifths of the head was palpable but no scar tenderness was noted. Vaginal examination showed a high presenting part and findings otherwise unchanged from the previous examination.
A liveborn female infant weighing 4.1 kg was delivered by emergency caesarean section. Apgar scores were 5 at one minute and 8 at five minutes. The cord blood results were abnormal (pH artery 6.9, base excess −14.6; pH vein 7.0, base excess −12.4).
The mother was transferred to the high dependency unit after delivery for 24 hours and made a good recovery. She was discharged on day 6. The baby was discharged on day 12 with arrangements for neurodevelopmental follow-up.
Questions
1 How should a woman who has had a caesarean section be counselled about her next delivery?
2 What life threatening complication probably occurred?
3 How should this patient be managed?
Answers
Short answers
1 Women who have had a caesarean section should be reviewed by a …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record








CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27