Clinical prediction rulesBMJ 2009; 339 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2899 (Published 07 August 2009) Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b2899
- Gavin Falk, clinical research fellow,
- Tom Fahey, professor of general practice
- 1Department of General Practice, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Medical School, Dublin 2, Republic of Ireland
- Correspondence to: T Fahey
What are they?
Clinical prediction rules quantify the contribution of symptoms, clinical signs, and available diagnostic tests, and stratify patients according to the probability of having a target disorder.1 The outcome of interest can be diverse and be anywhere along the diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic spectrum. Developing and validating a clinical prediction rule is a form of observational epidemiological research that requires referring to specific methodological standards.2 3
These rules usually go through three distinct stages before they are used in a clinical setting:
Development of the rule—establishing the independent and combined effect of explanatory variables (or clinical predictors), which can be symptoms, signs, or diagnostic tests
Narrow and broad validation—the explanatory variables or clinical predictors in the derivation set are assessed in separate populations
Impact analysis—a randomised controlled trial measures the impact of applying the rule in a clinical setting in terms of patient outcome, health professionals’ behaviour, resource use, or any combination of these.
The CAGE score (box) is a clinical example of a rule developed to aid in the diagnosis of alcohol abuse.
The CAGE questionnaire
Each positive answer scores one point.
1. Have you ever felt you should Cut down on …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Sign up for a free trial