Cervarix protects against high grade cervical lesions
Human papillomavirus (HPV) types 16 and 18 cause around 70% of cervical cancers worldwide, and GlaxoSmithKline’s bivalent vaccine against both types is already being given to teenage girls in several countries. Final analyses from the company’s large efficacy trial suggest that Cervarix prevents 70.2% (96.1% CI 54.7% to 80.9%) of high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN grade 2 or worse) lesions in young women who have no evidence of current or past infection when vaccinated. They analysed around 9000 participants aged 15-25. All had at least one dose of Cervarix or a control hepatitis A vaccine, and they were meant to represent the target population for primary vaccination—teenage girls who haven’t yet had sex.
So called “catch-up” vaccination programmes are also a possibility, so the authors did further analyses in a broader population that included sexually active women, one quarter of whom had already been infected with HPV. Cervarix prevented 30.4% (16.4% to 42.1%) of CIN 2 or worse lesions during a follow-up of nearly three years.
The authors estimate that their vaccine also prevents between 37% and 54% of high grade cervical lesions caused by HPV types other than 16 or 18.
All well and good, says a linked comment (doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61247-2), but these lethal viruses will never be eradicated until we also vaccinate boys and men.
Surgical refinements to microdiscectomy make little difference to patients
In 1997, surgeons refined traditional microdiscectomy to reduce tissue damage during surgery and potentially speed recovery⇑. Initial trials looked promising, but the latest and largest shows that tubular discectomy may be associated with worse, not better, outcomes after a year. Three hundred and twenty eight adults with persistent leg pain from a herniated disc had a traditional microdiscectomy or a tubular discectomy. Both groups made a good recovery in the first two weeks. By the end of one year, those …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012