Editorials

Pain and radiographic damage in osteoarthritis

BMJ 2009; 339 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2802 (Published 21 August 2009) Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b2802
  1. Theodore Pincus, clinical professor of medicine1,
  2. Joel A Block, professor of medicine and of biochemistry2
  1. 1New York University School of Medicine, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, 301 East 17th Street, New York, NY 10003, USA
  2. 2Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
  1. tedpincus{at}gmail.com

    Are correlated, but managing individual patients requires consideration of other factors

    A person who has severe knee pain and extensive radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis is thought to have an “obvious” explanation for the pain. Some people, however, may have severe radiographic damage (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 41) with no pain, or vice versa.2 Such discordances, which are also seen in rheumatoid arthritis,3 have been the subject of much interest for clinicians and researchers. Some researchers have suggested that little or no relation exists between the “illness” of joint pain and the “disease” of radiographic osteoarthritis.

    In the linked study (doi:10.1136/bmj.b2844), Neogi and colleagues assess the association between knee pain and radiographic osteoarthritis in people whose knees were discordant for pain.4 The study design was a within person, knee matched case-control study that examined 696 people from the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study (MOST) and 336 from Framingham. Odds ratios were 151 (95% confidence interval 43 …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe