The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration

BMJ 2009; 339 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700 (Published 21 July 2009)
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b2700

Related articles

Research: Effect of screening sigmoidoscopy and screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies

Research: Undetermined impact of patient decision support interventions on healthcare costs and savings: systematic review

Research: Probiotic supplementation during pregnancy or infancy for the prevention of asthma and wheeze: systematic review and meta-analysis

Research: The effect of fall prevention exercise programmes on fall induced injuries in community dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Editorial: The problem of duplicate systematic reviews

Research: Global eradication rates for Helicobacter pylori infection: systematic review and meta-analysis of sequential therapy

Research: Can trial quality be reliably assessed from published reports of cancer trials: evaluation of risk of bias assessments in systematic reviews

Research: Effect of increased potassium intake on cardiovascular risk factors and disease: systematic review and meta-analyses

Research: Effect of lower sodium intake on health: systematic review and meta-analyses

Research: Prediction models for risk of developing type 2 diabetes: systematic literature search and independent external validation study

Research: Reporting of conflicts of interest from drug trials in Cochrane reviews: cross sectional study

Research: Risk of pneumonia associated with use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers: systematic review and meta-analysis

Research: Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after total hip or knee replacement: systematic review, meta-analysis, and indirect treatment comparisons

Research: Statins and prevention of infections: systematic review and meta-analysis of data from large randomised placebo controlled trials

Research: Multiplicity of data in trial reports and the reliability of meta-analyses: empirical study

Research: Angiotensin receptor blockers and risk of myocardial infarction: meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses of 147 020 patients from randomised trials

Research: Prevention of pain on injection of propofol: systematic review and meta-analysis

Research: Clinical effectiveness of elective single versus double embryo transfer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials

Analysis: What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews?

Analysis: GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations

Research: Treatment of human brucellosis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Research: Financial ties and concordance between results and conclusions in meta-analyses: retrospective cohort study

RESEARCH: Financial ties and concordance between results and conclusions in meta-analyses: retrospective cohort study

Analysis: Uncertainty in heterogeneity estimates in meta-analyses

Research: Dressings for venous leg ulcers: systematic review and meta-analysis

RESEARCH: Dressings for venous leg ulcers: systematic review and meta-analysis

Research: Cochrane reviews compared with industry supported meta-analyses and other meta-analyses of the same drugs: systematic review

RESEARCH: Cochrane reviews compared with industry supported meta-analyses and other meta-analyses of the same drugs: systematic review

News: Compliance with QUOROM and quality of reporting of overlapping meta-analyses on the role of acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast associated nephropathy: case study

RESEARCH: Compliance with QUOROM and quality of reporting of overlapping meta-analyses on the role of acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast associated nephropathy: case study

Paper: How strong is the evidence for the use of perioperative β blockers in non-cardiac surgery? Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

PAPERS: How strong is the evidence for the use of perioperative β blockers in non-cardiac surgery? Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Paper: Assessment of methodological quality of primary studies by systematic reviews: results of the metaquality cross sectional study

PAPERS: Assessment of methodological quality of primary studies by systematic reviews: results of the metaquality cross sectional study

Paper: Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors

PAPERS: Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors

Paper: Bad reporting does not mean bad methods for randomised trials: observational study of randomised controlled trials performed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group

Paper: Evidence b(i)ased medicine—selective reporting from studies sponsored by pharmaceutical industry: review of studies in new drug applications

Paper: Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review

Paper: Quality of Cochrane reviews: assessment of sample from 1998

Editorial: The Campbell Collaboration

Education and debate: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials

Paper: Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus medical treatment for non-acute coronary heart disease: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Paper: Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses

Paper: The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials

Paper: Effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in critically ill adult patients: systematic review of randomised controlled trials

Paper: Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

Paper: Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study

This article has been cited by other articles:

THIS WEEK'S POLL