Do not-for-profit nursing homes provide better quality?

BMJ 2009; 339 doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2683 (Published 4 August 2009)
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b2683

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. R Tamara Konetzka, assistant professor
  1. 1University of Chicago, Department of Health Studies, 5841 S Maryland, MC2007, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
  1. konetzka{at}uchicago.edu

    Possibly, but current evidence is too weak to prove a causal association

    In the linked systematic review (doi:10.1136/bmj.b2732), Comondore and colleagues assess the relation between profit status and the quality of care in nursing homes and conduct a meta-analysis of four quality measures.1 The association between profit status and the quality of health care has been controversial for decades. The controversy stems partly from theoretical ambiguity and partly from lack of definitive empirical evidence. In theory, not-for-profit healthcare providers may provide a higher quality of care because their mission might include quality and because they do not need to divert resources to shareholders and taxes. On the other hand, for-profit providers may feel greater pressure to compete on price and quality, and this may result in higher quality care that is also more efficient. Unfortunately, rigorous testing of these competing theories is limited because it is impractical to conduct randomised controlled trials of profit status. Methods to mimic randomisation in observational studies (for example, instrumental variables2) are …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL