This article has a correction
Please see: Access to antimalarial therapy: accurate diagnosis is essential to achieving long term goals
- Heidi Hopkins, researcher1,
- Caroline Asiimwe, coordinator for malaria diagnostics implementation1,
- David Bell, scientist, malaria diagnostics2
- 1Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND), Kampala, Uganda
- 2World Health Organization—Regional Office for the Western Pacific
- Correspondence to: H Hopkins heidi.hopkins{at}finddiagnostics.org
- Accepted 30 May 2009
Health care in malaria endemic areas of Africa is at a crucial tipping point. On the positive side, increased commitment to and funding for malaria control is leading to improved access to effective antimalarial drugs, with over the counter availability and extensive subsidies. However, current efforts do not yet adequately address the need for tools to diagnose malaria accurately and track its incidence. Since presumptive case management leads to dramatic overuse of antimalarial drugs, programmes to improve access will also inevitably lead to further inappropriate treatment for individual patients, increased risk of parasite resistance to antimalarial compounds, and the potential diversion of hundreds of millions of dollars worth of antimalarial drugs to patients who do not actually have malaria. It is vital to make effective antimalarial treatment widely available,1 2 but doing so without equally intensive efforts to improve access to parasite based diagnosis is likely to be counterproductive. Thoughtful implementation of malaria diagnostics has the potential to improve care and resource allocation, with broad public health significance.
Background
Prompt access to treatment with effective antimalarial drugs is essential to the control and elimination of malaria, and to reducing child and adult mortality.3 In recent years, development of resistance to various antimalarial drugs has necessitated a change to artemisinin derivatives as firstline treatment in nearly all endemic countries. Continued use of older drugs to which resistance has developed leads to poor clinical outcomes and heightened mortality.4 Although coordinated efforts have been made to improve the availability of artemisinin based combination therapies and to encourage their correct use, studies show that access is …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27