- Caroline F Wright, head of science1,
- Lyn S Chitty, reader and consultant in genetics and fetal medicine 23
- 1PHG Foundation, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge CB1 8RN
- 2Clinical Molecular Genetics, Institute of Child Health, London WC1N 1EH
- 3Fetal Medicine Unit, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Wing, University College Hospital, London NW1 2BU
- Correspondence to: C F Wright caroline.wright{at}phgfoundation.org
- Accepted 27 April 2009
Summary points
Cell-free fetal DNA (and RNA) found in maternal blood during pregnancy can be used for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of specific genetic traits
Potential applications include determining fetal sex, diagnosing certain single gene disorders, fetal blood genotyping, and screening for Down’s syndrome
Specialist centres already offer non-invasive determination of fetal sex and RHD typing for high risk pregnancies, and the technique will probably become widely available for other indications in three to five years
This technology offers safer, earlier, and easier antenatal testing than current standard practice but raises ethical, legal, and social concerns, including those around informed consent and equity of access
Research into non-invasive prenatal diagnosis is ongoing, and the public and healthcare professionals must be kept informed about the progress and limitations of this technology
The landmark discovery that cell-free fetal DNA circulates in maternal blood during pregnancy has stimulated research worldwide into many potential applications in obstetric care.1 Improvements in molecular genetic technology over the same period have enabled the translation of cell-free fetal DNA testing into clinical practice for early non-invasive prenatal identification of some genetic traits. However, complex wider ethical, legal, and social problems associated with the technology, as well as implications for clinical and laboratory services, still need careful consideration. This article gives an overview of recent developments in cell-free fetal nucleic acid technology and its implications for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis and screening.
Sources and selection criteria
We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Collaboration, and Science Direct using the terms “non-invasive prenatal diagnosis” and “free fetal DNA” (and common variations), in addition to using personal archives of references. We also led a working group of experts and key stakeholders in the United Kingdom to review the area and make recommendations for implementation of this technology in the NHS.
What are the drawbacks of current prenatal diagnostic tests?
Prenatal screening and diagnosis form a routine part of antenatal …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27