- Donald M Arnold, assistant professor of medicine 13,
- Julia Anderson, associate professor of medicine, consultant haematologist12,
- Clive Kearon, professor of medicine1
- 1Michael De Groote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- 2Department of Haematology, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh
- 3Canadian Blood Services, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Correspondence to: C Kearon, Hamilton Health Sciences, Henderson Division, 711 Concession Street, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8V 1C3 kearonc{at}mcmaster.ca
The patient
A 64 year old woman who is scheduled to have a total hip replacement is concerned that she may have a heightened risk of bleeding or thrombosis because she was told her father had died of a “clotting complication” after a car crash when he was 40 years old. It is not known if bleeding or pulmonary embolism was suspected of contributing to her father’s death. The patient would like to know if she should have testing before her surgery to find out if she is at risk for bleeding or venous thromboembolism.
What is the next investigation?
The next investigation depends on the patient’s personal and family history.
Personal medical history
The first and the most important step in the assessment of a patient’s personal risk of bleeding (figure)⇓ and thrombosis with surgery is to review the medical history and current drugs (use of anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy, for example).
Assessing a patient’s risk of bleeding and thrombosis with surgery
Risk of bleeding
This patient has had three children, a tonsillectomy as a child, and a cholecystectomy, none of which was complicated by excessive bleeding. Based on clinical experience and a systematic review that evaluated the ability of a history of bleeding to predict postoperative bleeding,1 the lack of excessive bleeding after these major haemostatic challenges strongly suggests that she does not have a longstanding major bleeding disorder. She describes having heavy menstrual periods, but she …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Ethical considerations
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Raised inflammatory markers
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Published 14 February 2012
Smokefree cars in Wales: Laws are better
Published 14 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (8 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012