- Janice Hopkins Tanne
- 1New York
The US Supreme Court has ruled that the drug company Wyeth was liable for $6.7m (£4.7m; €5.3m) in damages in a lawsuit brought by Diana Levine, a guitarist from Vermont. Ms Levine’s right forearm was amputated because of gangrene caused by an injection of Wyeth’s drug promethazine hydrochloride (Phenergan). She said that the drug’s label did not sufficiently warn of its risks.
Wyeth had argued that because the drug’s labelling had been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration it was protected from lawsuits brought in state courts, as Ms Levine’s was. Federal law is usually considered to pre-empt state law.
Justice John Paul Stevens, who wrote the court’s opinion, said that drug makers, not the FDA, are primarily responsible for their drug labelling.
The Supreme Court’s ruling, on 4 March in a 6-3 decision, means …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27