Editorials

Practice based commissioning in the UK

BMJ 2009; 338 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b832 (Published 13 March 2009) Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b832
  1. Stephen Gillam, general practitioner1,
  2. Richard Q Lewis, director2
  1. 1Luton LU1 1HH
  2. 2Ernst and Young LLP, London SE1 2AF
  1. sjg67{at}medschl.cam.ac.uk

    Reinvigoration will require more than just extra funding

    An editorial in the BMJ a year ago asked whether practice based commissioning was “the sick man of the NHS reforms.”1 Practice based commissioning has been a central part of the government’s health policy since April 2005, when interested practices were first entitled to indicative budgets. The paucity of achievements described in a recent assessment by the King’s Fund suggests that the health of this patient is little improved.2 The government has recently clarified its vision for practice based commissioning, but will this be enough to deal with its persistent weaknesses?3

    Commissioning is a mechanism for managing financial risk while matching services supplied to patients needs (or demands) in a quasi-market where patients do not pay for services directly. However, nearly two decades of experimentation in the English NHS have provided little evidence that any form of commissioning has greatly affected hospital services. Commissioning led by primary care has delivered some benefits in primary and intermediate care and some improvements in the responsiveness …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe