- Björn Strander, director
- 1Cervical Screening Oncology Centre, Sahlgren’s University Hospital, SE-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden
- bjorn.strander{at}oc.gu.se
Ever since the first organised cervical screening programmes started in Europe more than 40 years ago discussion about the upper age limit for effective screening has been ongoing. The debate is still relevant because mass vaccination of pre-adolescent girls against two or more types of human papillomavirus (HPV) will not affect the incidence of cancer in girls born around the turn of the millennium until 2050-60. In the linked study (doi:10.1136/bmj.b1354), Rebolj and colleagues report that the incidence of cervical cancer is similar in 218 847 women aged 45-54 years and 445 382 women aged 30-44 after their third negative smear.1
Evidence suggests that repeating smear tests in women aged 60-65 whose previous tests have been normal has little, if any, benefit,2 and some researchers have proposed that the age limit should be lowered to 50.3 4 In all European programmes, cervical cancer screening stops at a lower age than breast cancer screening, and in some programmes …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Does iron deficiency without anaemia cause fatigue and what is the reason behind it?
Published 26 May 2012
Re: Histology of Pilar Cysts - a counsel of perfection?
Published 26 May 2012
Re: David Southall: anatomy of a wrecked career
Published 26 May 2012
Re: The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality
Published 26 May 2012
Re: Five years after baby Peter
Published 26 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27