High Court rules that NICE process lacked transparency

BMJ 2009; 338 doi: 10.1136/bmj.b772 (Published 23 February 2009)
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b772

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Clare Dyer
  1. 1BMJ

    A drug company has won a High Court ruling that the processes of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) lack transparency. NICE will have to reconsider its guidelines for treatments to prevent fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

    Mr Justice Holman said that the advisory body on drug spending in the NHS in England and Wales had merely gone “through the motions so they could claim they had done their duty” in trying to get consent to disclose confidential material to the company and patient groups.

    Servier Laboratories, which makes the drug strontium ranelate (Protelos), challenged guidance that it said unfairly restricted access to the treatment for NHS patients.

    NICE had refused to disclose the full economic model on which its cost-benefit analysis …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL