- David C J Hutchins, medical student,
- Stuart M White, consultant in anaesthesia
- 1Brighton Anaesthesia Research Forum, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, East Sussex BN2 5BE
- Correspondence to: S M White stuart.white{at}bsuh.nhs.uk
- Accepted 18 November 2008
Both the UK government and the British Medical Association have recently published strategies for “greener” health care.1 2 An audit of anaesthetic waste at our hospital found that about 40% of all waste (roughly 950 kg/theatre/year) was potentially recyclable paper, card, plastic, and glass, and only 4% by weight of sharps bin contents was true sharp waste. Although recycling has potential environmental and financial benefits, it is hampered by convenience, technology, lack of knowledge, concerns about environmental safety, and statutory regulation. We discuss how clinicians might cut the amount of waste they produce by reducing, reusing, and recycling resources and suggest ideas for future research.
Anaesthetic waste
The NHS produced 408 218 tonnes of waste in 2005-6, 29% of which was clinical waste, and spent nearly £73m (€80m; $103m) on its disposal. This is equivalent to 5.5 kg of waste per patient per day. By comparison, France and Germany, which historically have a greater cultural, political, and statutory commitment to waste minimisation and recycling,3 produce only 1.9 kg and 0.4 kg/patient/day, respectively.4
Over the past 5-10 years, concerns about the risk of prion transmission and sterility have led to large increases in both the amount of anaesthetic packaging and the use of disposable devices. Most of the waste is incinerated, although some of it is potentially recyclable.
We recently completed a two week audit of the waste produced by six operating theatres at the Royal Sussex County Hospital in Brighton. The results were striking: 540 kg of sharps and non-sharps anaesthetic waste was produced (about 2300 kg/theatre/year), 40% of which was potentially recyclable paper, card, …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012