- Gerald Liew, ophthalmology registrar2,
- Paul Mitchell, professor of ophthalmology2,
- Tien Y Wong, professor of ophthalmology1
- 1Singapore Eye Research Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore 168751
- 2Centre for Vision Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
- ophwty{at}nus.edu.sg
Diabetic retinopathy is a major cause of blindness in adults. Ever since the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) and Diabetes Control and Complications Trials (DCCT),1 2 3 intensive control of blood glucose and blood pressure has been the mainstay of the systemic management of diabetic retinopathy. Because epidemiological studies indicated a direct and continuous relation between the degree of hyperglycaemia and the risk of diabetic retinopathy,4 the control of blood sugar and blood pressure has been guided by the belief that “lower is better.”
Three new trials in the past year—Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease (ADVANCE), the Diabetic Retinopathy Candesartan Trials (DIRECT), and Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD)—have provided new insights into the effectiveness and limitations of systemic treatment for diabetic retinopathy.
ADVANCE recruited 11 140 patients with type 2 diabetes and found that lowering glycated haemoglobin to 6.5% or less had no measurable effect on five year incident retinopathy (6.0% intensive treatment v 6.3% standard treatment).5 Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were also lowered by a mean of 5.6 mm Hg and 2.2 mm Hg, respectively, from a starting value of 145/81 mm Hg. However, this considerable reduction did not alter the four year incidence or progression of diabetic retinopathy …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27